PERBANDINGAN KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH SEWAKTU  METODE GOD-PAP DAN METODE POCT PADA PASIEN DIABETES MELITUS DI RUMAH SAKIT TINGKAT III 04.06.01 WIJAYA KUSUMA PURWOKERTO

Rifki Firdaus Iksan

doi:10.52488/jnh.v10i1.448

Authors

Rifki Firdaus Iksan Politeknik Yakpermas Banyumas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52488/jnh.v10i1.448

Keywords:

Diabetes mellitus, GOD-PAP, POCT.

Abstract

Diabetes is the main cause of blindness, kidney failure, heart disease, stroke, and can result in amputation of body parts. Controlling blood sugar levels is very necessary for diabetes mellitus sufferers, apart from using medical therapy, maintaining a diet and doing exercise are also very helpful in controlling blood sugar levels. According to data from the Banyumas Regency Health Service (2022), the number of people suffering from the non-communicable disease diabetes mellitus is 23,461 spread across 27 sub-districts in Banyumas Regency and increases every year.

The research was carried out experimentally by comparing the results of checking blood glucose levels using the GOD-PAP and POCT methods. The parameters of this research are the independent and dependent variables, the independent variable is the GOD-PAP method with the POCT method, the dependent variable is glucose levels in patients. The statistical test in this study used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to determine the significance of the blood glucose results of the GOD-PAP method and POCT method. With significance (p<0.05), which shows that H0 or H1 is accepted or rejected.

The samples in this study were 62 samples with the results of the examination showing glucose levels using the GOD-PAP method, a minimum glucose value of 70 mg/dL, a maximum of 289 mg/dL and an average of 119 mg/dL. POCT method glucose levels, the minimum glucose value is 85 mg/dL, the maximum is 363 mg/dL and the average is 129 mg/dL. The P-value from the calculation results is 0.000, so it can be concluded that H1 is accepted, namely that there is a difference in the glucose level results of the GOD-PAP method and the POCT method at TK III Hospital 04.06.01 Wijaya Kusuma Purwokerto.

References

Anita. (2018). Hubungan Tingkat Stress dengan Kadar Gula Darah pada Pasien Diabetes Mellitus di RSUD Kota Madiun. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Baharuddin, B., Nurulita, A. Arif, M.

‘Uji Glukosa Darah Antara Metode

Cicih, S. 2020. Hubungan pola makan

dengan kejadian kolestrol pada lansia di

Derek, M. I., Rottie, J. V., dan Kallo V. (2017). Hubungan Tingkat Stres Dengan Kadar Gula Darah pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe II Di Rumah Sakit Pancaran Kasih GMIM Manado.

Elisa Oktaviana., Bahjatun Nadrati., Lalu Dedy Supriyatna., Zuliardi., Syamdarniati. 2022. Lentera Jurnal, 2(2).

Ervina Eka Mustofa., Janu Purwono., Ludiana. 2022. Jurnal Cendekia Muda, 2(1).Heksokinase Dengan Glukosa Oksidase Dan Glukosa Dehidrogenase Di Diabetes Melitus’, Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory, 21(2), pp. 170.

Ganong, W.F. 2010. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran. Jakarta: EGC.

Herviyani, D.W. 2017. Perbandingan Kadar Glukosa Darah antara Metoda POCT dan Metoda GOD-PAP dengan Metoda Heksokinase. Program Studi D-IV Analis Kesehatan, Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Setia Budi.

International Diabetes Federation. 2019.

Idf diabetes atlas 9th ed. BELGIUM:

Kahar, H. 2018. Keuntungan Dan

Kerugian Penjaminan Mutu Berdasarkan Uji

Kementrian Kesehatan RI. 2018. Riset kesehatan dasar. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI.

Memastikan Kecermatan (Poct). Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory, 13(1). pp 38,

Nugraheni, S., Inanayatur, R., Iva, M. 2020. Asuhan keperawatan pada klien diabetes mellitus tipe 2 dengan gangguan integritas jaringan. Jurnal Keperawatan, 1(1), pp. 1-10.

Perkumpulan Endokrinologi Indonesia. Konsensus Pengelolaan dan Pencegahan diabetes Mellitus tipe II di Indonesia. Jakarta: PB PERKENI; 2015.

Rahmawati Y., Diyah, C.A.K., 2021. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kadar Gula Darah Pada Penderita Diabetes Melitus Tipe Ii: Literature Review.

Rofikoh, Handayani, S., dan Suraya, I. (2020). Determinan Kejadian Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 di Posbindu Mawar Kuning Gambir. ARKESMAS (Arsip Kesehatan Masyarakat), 5(1), 42–48.

Souliotis, K., Koutsovasilis, A., Vatheia, G., Golna, C., Nikolaidi, S., Hatziagelaki, E., Kotsa, K., Koufakis, T., Melidonis, A., Papazafiropoulou, A., Tentolouris, N., Siami, E., & Sotiropoulos, A. (2020). Profile and factors associated with glycaemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes in Greece: results from the diabetes registry. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 20(1), 16.

Tandra, H. (2008). Segala Sesuatu yang Harus Anda Ketahui tentang Diabetes: Panduan Lengkap Mengenal dan Mengatasi Diabetes dengan Cepat dan Mudah. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Taylor, S. I., Yazdi, Z. S., dan Beitelshees, A. L. 2021. Pharmacological treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 131(2).

Trisnawati, S. K., & Setyorogo, S. (2013). Faktor Risiko Kejadian Diabetes Melitus Tipe II Di Puskesmas Kecamatan Cengkareng Jakarta Barat Tahun 2012. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan.

Usman, J., Rahman, D., & Sulaiman, N. (2020). Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Kejadian Diabetes Melitus pada Pasien di RDUD Haji Makassar. 2, 16–22.

wilayah kerja puskesmas tambaksari. Jurnal Keperawatan Galuh, 2(1), pp 25-30.

World Health Organization. 2020. Changing The Game To Improve Availability And Affordability Of Quality-Assured Insulin And Associated Devices.

Wulandari, D., dan Kurnianingsih, W. (2018). Pengaruh Usia, Stres, dan Diet Tinggi Karbohidrat Terhadap Kadar Glukosa Darah. Infokes: Jurnal Ilmiah Rekam Medis Dan Informatika Kesehatan, 8(1).

Akhzami, D. R., Rizki, M. and Setyorini, R. H. (2016) ‘Perbandingan Hasil Point of Care Testing ( POCT ) Asam Urat dengan Chemistry Analyzer’, 5(4), pp. 15–19.